Netflix True Crime Drama ’42 Days of Darkness’ Ending Explained and Review

42 Days of Darkness' Ending Explained and Review

Netflix’s ’42 Days of Darkness’ Ending Explained, Recap and Review by Spiky TV – ’42 Days of Darkness’ on Netflix closes on a sombre tone. Although it is cryptic, the message is plain. The first Chilean series created by the streaming service is a fascinating watch, with a plot largely based on a genuine occurrence. The six-episode investigative drama is always asking difficult questions.

Veronica Montes, a mother of two, inexplicably vanishes, prompting her sister Cecilia to launch a desperate search. Local officials and the media delve into the case, which throws a curveball at every turn. The show’s emotional stakes are similarly high, as it focuses on Veronica’s children, Kari and Emi, and the turmoil they face as the investigation begins.

The Chilean series comes to a surprising conclusion in regard to Mario and the probe. If you want to have a closer look at it, you’ve come to the correct place!

42 Days of Darkness' Ending Explained

Recap of 42 Days of Darkness

Netflix’s ‘42 Days of Darkness‘ opens with Verónica assisting her two kids, Karen and Emilia, as they prepare to depart for school with her husband, Mario. Verónica receives an anonymous visitor after the three of them have left. Mario gets contacted by an unknown guy and woman who inform him that his wife has been kidnapped.

Karen returns home after class and discovers that her mother has gone missing. Karen phones her father to tell him about Verónica’s disappearance, and he informs the cops. They begin their search for the missing. Meanwhile, Nora and Braulio join Víctor Pizarro in investigating Verónica’s disappearance.

Pizarro and his colleagues investigate a number of possibilities for Verónica’s disappearance, including her fleeing with a probable lover, the woman fabricating her own disappearance, or Mario being involved. When the lawyer discovers that the police inquiry isn’t going well, he offers his services to the department, only to be dismissed by an official.

He meets Cecilia and offers to be the Montes family’s representative. Nora examines Mario’s call history and discovers that after learning of his wife’s abduction, he did not even call her phone once. His reluctance to offer DNA and blood samples to the cops further adds to the lawyer’s concerns.

When Mario thinks Cecilia is suspicious of him, he tells the cops that the woman who called him about the kidnapping is his sister-in-law. To get an opinion on Mario, the cops enlist the help of a psychologist. After seeing that the husband is speaking in the past tense about his missing wife, the psychologist advises the investigator to keep a watch on him.

Meanwhile, police dogs are brought in to find any things that have been overlooked. Mario becomes angry after learning how effective the dogs are. He informs the authorities the next day that he discovered Verónica’s body in the attic of their home. Verónica’s death appears to be a suicide, according to the autopsy.

Pizarro persuades Cecilia to do another forensic examination of the body years later. The body is exhumed, and the analysis indicates that Verónica’s death was caused by the usage of a hazardous drug. Despite this, the investigation comes to a halt. Pizarro is captivated with the case and finds it difficult to move on from it.

Many years later, he runs into one of his previous clients, who helps him identify the man in the police sketch as Jaime Ñunez Jara, the man who called Verónica the day she vanished. Asenjo arrests Jaime with the help of Pizarro, who confesses to killing Verónica on Mario’s behalf in exchange for a 5 million peso settlement. Mario is arrested for allegedly hiring Jaime to murder his wife. Despite Jaime’s confession, the prosecution must find evidence linking him to Mario in order to condemn him.

42 Days of Darkness' Recap

Did Mario Hire Jaime at the End of 42 Days of Darkness?

Jaime’s confession, according to Pizarro and Cecilia, reinforces their belief that Mario is engaged in the crime in some way. Their joy is short-lived, however, as the prosecution needs more proof to prove that the deceased’s husband bribed Jaime to murder her. Pizarro’s whole case hinged on Roberto’s probable evidence, as he had witnessed Jaime calling Mario from the internet café.

Roberto, on the other hand, declines to assist Pizarro since he is unsure about recognising Jaime as the caller after five years. Pizarro has nothing against Mario since Roberto does not want to tamper with the fate of a person without perfect confidence.

Because the prosecution has failed to produce any evidence that Mario paid Jaime, the judge begins to favour the spouse. Jaime also decides not to testify in court, rendering his confession of being recruited by Mario inadmissible as evidence.

The prosecution’s case against Mario crumbles without Jaime’s confession, and Mario is acquitted. Mario is able to leave the courtroom after the defence wins his case. Jaime’s case is classified as a robbery with homicide, and he is condemned as Verónica’s single murderer.

Even Pizarro isn’t sure that Mario hired Jaime because the notion is founded solely on the latter’s remarks. The dates on which Jaime had money with him predate Verónica’s disappearance and later death, casting doubt on his statement.

Furthermore, there is no evidence that Mario transferred or handed over $2 million to him, complicating the case further. Finally, the judiciary needs evidence to accept a theory as fact, because Mario did not hire Jaime and had no role in his wife’s death, according to the judiciary.

Why is Jaime refusing to testify against Mario

Why is Jaime refusing to testify against Mario?

Even if Pizarro is unable to obtain any proof against Mario, he is confident that his case will be upheld in court based solely on Jaime’s confession and testimony. Jaime’s refusal to testify astounds him, rendering his confession invalid. Pizarro believes Mario paid Jaime enough money to get him to drop out of the case.

The lawyer believes he must have made a bargain with Mario or his lawyer for the benefit of his child because he has a daughter who lives alone. Jaime, being the sole earner in his family of just him and his daughter, may have believed that her existence did not bear witness.

Whether or not Jaime testifies, he understands that the only way out is to go to prison. Jaime may have thought that not testifying would be more beneficial to him and his daughter, Pizarro believes. It’s not surprising that Jaime chose silence over justice because his only priority has always been survival.

Although Pizarro never believes Mario is innocent, Karen and Emilia, Verónica’s daughters, feel Jaime opted not to testify since their father had nothing to do with him.

Do Pizarro and Joaco Get Back Together

Do Pizarro and Joaco Get Back Together? What is their purpose in visiting Santiago?

Pizarro’s passion for serving his community and his fixation with seeing justice win in his culture badly damages his connection with his son Joaco. He has never been present for his son as a parent, and he gradually loses touch with him emotionally. The lawyer recognises that his son deserves a better father after the trial of Mario and Jaime.

He spends time with him, and the two of them even go camping together. Pizarro and Joaco’s fragile friendship is harmed by Verónica’s death and the accompanying investigations, and the lawyer eventually makes amends to be with his son.

Pizarro recommends to Joaco while camping that they live in Santiago to satisfy the latter’s goal. Joaco had always wanted to live in Chile’s capital, where opportunities are unlimited. He’d yearned to extend his wings beyond the confines of Southern Chile. Pizarro, as a loving father, offers to assist him in realising his ambition by relocating to the city.

His decision, though, may not be only motivated by his desire to see his son happy. Pizarro pulls a newspaper from his pocket and reads a report about a young woman who has been gone for three days after alerting Joaco of his choice.

The case of the missing woman must have occurred in Santiago, and Pizarro’s decision to travel to the capital city could have been motivated by his desire to represent the woman’s family. Pizarro wants a triumph to convince himself that justice can prevail in his country after losing Mario’s trial.

So it’s possible that he’ll travel to Santiago to help the family. Pizarro will almost certainly sacrifice himself for the sake of justice, and the case of the missing woman could be the next chapter in his life. If that’s the case, his rekindled romance with Joaco may be jeopardised.

Review of '42 Days of Darkness' Series

Review of ’42 Days of Darkness’ Series

Veronica Montes, the murder victim, had a family of her own. Karen and Emi were her two daughters from her marriage to Mario Medina. Montes vanished on June 29, 2010, with no proof of abduction or murder to assist the police.

Veronica’s camera, on the other hand, appeared to be missing from her home. Some suspected that she fled with her lover, while others claimed she was murdered by her husband or another family member.

Crime thrillers are notorious for being mind-boggling since the antagonist is never identified. The criminal’s crime is frequently the result of their poor circumstances and personal histories. When it comes to a show like this, though, it allows viewers to have their say on who the criminal is, testing their prejudices.

The series’ cinematography, as well as the locales, play an important role; the dark locations set the series’ sad tone. The inhabitants’ lives are made more mysterious by the lonely dwellings, which are surrounded by a lake. The music in the show also contributes to the overall tone, producing a disturbing atmosphere and allowing viewers to experience Veronica’s frantic cries for aid.

The characters’ strength enhances the tone throughout 42 Days of Darkness. The emotional contours of the mourning siblings, confused children, and driven careerists match the outstanding screenplay with their performances. Because the characters speak and think like actual people, the series feels authentic. The episodes focus on their reactions to the case’s progress.

42 Days of Darkness is a Chilean television series that exposes viewers to a wide range of writing and topic. Even though it is a fictitious work based on a true story, the accuracy of the story is astounding. It is a must-see for true-crime fans since it allows them to enter the world of international crime shows. With top-notch performances and great content, the series will keep viewers wondering until the very end.

The series also highlights the investigating process while focusing on the characters’ psychological issues. Although Veronica’s death remains a mystery, 42 Days of Darkness may provide viewers with several Easter eggs.