What is the Real Meaning Of The School For Good And Evil’s Ending – A 2022 fantasy movie with the same name is based on the Soman Chainani book of the same name. Paul Feig, who co-wrote the screenplay with David Magee, directed the movie. The movie follows Sophie and Agatha as they arrive at the School for Good and Evil, where Sophie is assigned to the Evil side while Agatha is assigned to the Good side. Sophia Anne Caruso and Sofia Wylie lead the ensemble cast as Sophie and Agatha, respectively.
The movie’s production got underway in 2013 when Roth Films and Jane Startz Productions bought the rights to the novel. Initially, Universal Pictures was going to be the movie’s distributor. Paul Feig was chosen to helm the film after Netflix gained control of it in 2017 after it had been mired in development hell. Caruso and Wylie were cast as the parts they will be playing in December 2020. Between January and July 2021, Northern Ireland served as the location for principal photography.
Also Read: “Black Adam” (2022) Movie Ending Explained
Meaning Of “The School For Good And Evil” Movie’s Ending
The School For Good And Evil’s ending actually means that it isn’t really good or evil; instead, there are just good or evil choices, contrary to what the Netflix film’s title suggests. Sophie becomes Evil because of her unwavering conviction that she is Good and her desire to switch schools, which causes her to make self-centered decisions with little regard for the consequences.
Agatha was able to act uninfluenced and naturally selflessly because she didn’t think there was a fundamental conflict between good and evil (including Sophie). At the conclusion of The School for Good and Evil, Sophie repudiates Evil and aids Agatha, reinforcing the idea that no one is destined for a particular outcome and that people are not defined by their decisions.
According to the narrator Cate Blanchett, Agatha’s choice was “the conclusion of the story,” but Tedros showed there was still more to be revealed. I need you, Agatha, Tedros says as one of his arrows pierces the vortex separating Agatha and Sophie’s worlds in Galvaldon, the world of the schools.
For Soman’s second book in the School for Good and Evil trilogy, A World Without Princes, the message serves as a crucial plot aspect. Tedros, as opposed to Agatha, requests Sophie’s return to the school in the book. According to Soman, the film’s conclusion was faithful to the books. Still, the addition of Agatha’s name increased the “ambiguity” of Tedros’ scheme to exact revenge on Sophie for having taken his love away.
Soman comments of the ending, “The difference is in the second book, you know, Tedros is angry at Sophie because he really wanted Agath. So it was just a matter of getting to the heart of the matter, which is what he really wants is Agatha back, so the question is how you play it at the beginning of a second movie.”
The author continues, “To me, it’s sort of the same point basically being that when the arrow comes at the end of the movie, we don’t really know who that arrow is for, is it a message to Agatha being like ‘come back’ or is it directed at Sophie like, ‘get out of the way so I can have Agatha back’? So that ambiguity still leaves you willing to do exactly what you need to do from book two.”
— Soman Chainani (@SomanChainani) September 13, 2022
You can watch The School for Good and Evil on Netflix.